RIADeFi
Refusal file · other

Why Ketju rejected Mantle Bridge

Memo v1Published by Ketju Research

A registry memo, published verbatim and versioned. Superseded versions are recorded, never edited away. A rejection is a judgment for Ketju's client base and thesis, not a universal safety claim. Not investment, legal, tax, or compliance advice.

The memo

REJECTED ON THE SAME AXES THAT SANK WORLD CHAIN AND LINEA IN THIS BATCH. Mantle Network has made real architectural progress — an OP-Succinct upgrade in September 2025 replaced optimistic fraud-proof validation with SP1 zkVM validity proofs, and an April 2026 upgrade moved data availability to native Ethereum blob space — but L2Beat rates its exit window as "None," the identical rating already used to reject Linea in this registry, because contracts are instantly upgradable through a 6-of-14 multisig with no delay on any material contract except the token itself. State-root proposers are permissioned, not open, paralleling the permissioned-validator structures already rejected for Robinhood Chain and World Chain. Real mechanism-level progress does not change the governance-concentration facts this registry actually prices.

What would reopen the file

  • State-root proposer verification becomes permissionless, removing the current whitelist requirement
  • A minimum standing delay, even 24 to 72 hours, is introduced between MantleSecurityMultisig upgrade approval and execution
  • L2Beat no longer rates Mantle's exit window as "None"
  • Current withdrawal timing is independently confirmed against a live transaction rather than conflicting documentation

Facts on file

Verdict
Rejected
Exposure
other
Chains examined
Ethereum
Memo version
v1
Reviewed
Next review

← All published refusals