RIADeFi
Research files · liquidity provision

Ketju research: Convex Finance

Adverse research assessmentPublished by Ketju Research

This file describes the economic claim, control, loss, and exit evidence. Firm-shelf policy is a separate conclusion; client action and amount belong to the advisor. Not investment, legal, tax, or compliance advice.

Research summary

ADVERSE RESEARCH ASSESSMENT because Convex does not create a new low-risk return source; it adds a reward, governance and contract layer to Curve or Frax positions the client must already be willing to own. Curve LP deposits remain redeemable through Convex, but their pool inventory, depeg, liquidity and smart-contract risks remain. CRV converted to cvxCRV is different: Convex locks that CRV permanently as veCRV and gives the holder a transferable cvxCRV receipt with no protocol redemption back to CRV. Exit therefore depends on secondary-market liquidity and price. CVX vote locking adds a separate sixteen-epoch liquidity commitment. The protocol discloses a 3-of-5 multisig with fee, pool-management, shutdown and voting powers, and its own known-issues page documents a complex residual fake-gauge/shutdown path. Convex may be useful infrastructure for specialists already underwriting Curve governance, but the extra boost does not justify irreversible cvxCRV conversion or delegated gauge exposure in this advisor diversification sleeve.

Observable review triggers

  • Any underlying pool or asset lacks its own current approval and proposed-size exit test
  • cvxCRV-to-CRV executable price falls more than 5% below parity at the proposed exit size
  • Any live Booster, reward wrapper or admin-controlled component is not mapped to a current audit
  • The published fake-gauge and forced-shutdown path loses its thirty-day warning period or gains a shorter route
  • A Convex shutdown, Curve pool imbalance or CVX lock prevents the documented client exit inside its written limit

Facts on file

Research assessment
Adverse
Client selection
Not considered
Exposure
liquidity provision
Chains examined
Ethereum
Reviewed
Next review

← All published research assessments