RIADeFi
The AtlasReviewed 2026-07-31

Ethereum: who orders transactions?

None: permissionless proposer set

No freeze key

This page grades the chain layer only. Each asset and protocol on the chain carries risks of its own.

Who controls it

Control assessmentApproved
Stagen/a
Reviewed2026-07-31
Transaction ordering
None: permissionless proposer set
Escape hatch
None needed: Ethereum is the settlement layer.
Upgrade authority
Social consensus and a hard fork. No key can change state or seize funds.
Halts and outages
Ethereum has not halted since the Merge, and finality takes about 13 minutes. The standing concern is client concentration: Geth held about 50.1% of execution-layer share in Q4 2025. A bug in a supermajority client is the one scenario that could finalise a wrong chain. Institutional operators moved toward multi-client stacks through 2026 in response.

Ketju assessment

Ketju approves Ethereum: no sequencer, upgrade key or operator can be compelled to block or seize a client’s funds. Ketju measures every other chain against it. The cost is gas, because a client with a small position pays more here than on an L2. An advisor should state that trade-off to the client and should not route the client to Base to avoid it.

Review triggers

  • Any single execution client exceeding 66% share
  • Any single consensus client exceeding 66% share
  • Finality failure lasting more than 1 hour

Each trigger names a fact anyone can observe. If one occurs, Ketju will review the assessment again. None is a forecast.

Questions before use

  1. Does the client’s thesis require censorship resistance, or primarily low-cost settlement?
  2. Can the client withdraw without help from the party that normally orders transactions?
  3. Who can upgrade bridges or contracts, and what delay applies?
  4. Does the asset introduce an issuer weaker than the chain grade?
  5. What evidence will show a halt, censorship event, or governance change?

← The full Atlas