# Axelar approves a non-binding freeze and recustody signal

> The community created a formal on-chain record of recovery intent and authorized contributors to prepare a later binding proposal with freeze, custody, and redistribution mechanics.

- URL: https://riadefi.com/on-chain/2026-07-05-axelar-secret-bridge-recovery-signal-proposal-490/
- Type: Governance
- Stage: Approved, not executed
- Evidence: mixed
- Materiality: material
- Event date: 2026-07-05
- Version: 1, published 2026-08-22 (first published 2026-08-22)
- Follow-up: 2026-07-19
- Advisor-relevant: no
- Affects: Axelar (protocol)

Developing. Some claims here are not yet confirmed; they are listed apart from the confirmed facts. A new version replaces this one when the primary evidence changes.

## What happened

Axelar governance passed a non-binding signaling proposal supporting a coordinated freeze of funds attributed to the June Axelar–Secret IBC bridge attacker and later recustody to a vetted distributor.

## What changed

The community created a formal on-chain record of recovery intent and authorized contributors to prepare a later binding proposal with freeze, custody, and redistribution mechanics.

## What did not change

The text proposal did not freeze, seize, move, recustody, or distribute funds, and it did not select a distributor or approve a final victim-repayment plan.

## Confirmed

- Proposal 490 passed.
- The proposal is explicitly non-binding and carries no automatic on-chain action.
- It identifies axelar1hzra9z4zn8q0w8f3dj2wnw0xgetu8dfdhl6ad8 as the attacker-controlled wallet.
- It calls for a later binding proposal specifying the freeze mechanism, distributor, and redistribution plan.

## Still open

- Whether the identified funds were actually frozen remains unverified.
- The amount, asset composition, custody status, and recoverability of the referenced funds are not established by this record.
- No trusted distributor, binding payload, entitlement schedule, or repayment timing had been approved.

## What it means for an advisor

- Keep the Axelar incident and recovery path under memo review; a favorable signal is not recovered funds.
- Require operative freeze evidence and a binding, auditable distribution plan before crediting recovery.
- Continue monitoring bridge loss-allocation, custody, and cross-chain administrator powers implicated by the response.

## Sources

1. [Signaling Proposal: Freeze Hacker Funds and Recustody to a Trusted Distributor at a Later Date](https://axelarscan.io/proposal/490) · Axelar on-chain governance · 2026-07-05


---

Published by Ketju Research on RIADeFi (https://riadefi.com). Educational research for financial professionals; not investment, legal, tax, or compliance advice.